On Apr 18, 10:08=A0pm, Fred Vicarel wrote:
> =A0Stealing an elections more radical.
>
> Stealing two? =A0more so.
>
> Staring the wrong war for =A0the wrong reasons at the wrong time?
>
> Transforming =A0the country's largest budget surplus into the country's
> largest debt?
>
> Deserting a on a minimum of possible military service the country and
> still getting "elected" (see 1 and 2 above) president?
>
> Oh wait........... sitting stone still grinning like a .ing moron
> for over two minutes after being informed that the nation you preside
> over.the most powerful nation on earth, has been
> attacked.............. =A0I'm going with that that one. =A0THAT is
> Radical.
>
> But then, of course, in the larger sense, ...........hijacking a
> country (once the most popular and powerful and envied on earth) and
> turning it into the least of all of the the above..............that's
> Rad too, dude!
>
> Shit, I'm stumped. =A0Gotta surf. =A0I'll get back to you.
>
> Peas-out
>
> PS
> Going for it on fourth and two with under two minutes left against the
> undefeated Colts because you didn't want to give Peyton Manning the
> ball back so late in the game, in week nine or ten of the
> season.....that's honorable mention. =A0But then against, no one with
> sense (much less hindsight) is gonna argue that Belechick is not as
> big a .wad as BushyCheney-et-al-etc..
****************
Hey hey now...
Actually, it's been argued that Belichick went WITH the odds when he
pulled that maneuver.
In any case, I don't think he's anywhere near as bad as Bush, much
less Cheney... |
