In article , msifg says...
>they claim that the people of their choosing don't
>know how to write.
they don't. it's pretty obvious.
>they claim that people of their
>choosing are stupid and illiterate.
hey, it wasn't MY idea to give the mud-people access to the internet.
>they make all kinds of claims, but rarely if ever
>post anything but drivel on their side of things.
>evans farts out a poem a year if that.
>wells, well...nothing but drivel.
>gamble? drivel.
>sherman? drivel.
>b's cat? drivel.
that's only because we're the meanest of people. if we were nice, you would say
nice things about us, and tell us how wonderful we are, as long as we played
along and told you how wonderful YOU are.
it really does frighten me how right i am all the time.
>now, ross, karla, jeanne and houstman DO write.
indeed. very well. so do Mr. Evans and Gamble.
and if Rob and Gary and all the others told you and your union of mud-people
that you were good writers, you wouldn't be posting this amusing whine.
you're just mad because you want everyone to enable the high school circle-jerk
you believe this should be. sorry, life is hard, then you end up writing
laughable shit and being mocked by people intellectually superior to you.
>however, how come it is that just because they
>write means everybody of their choosing sucks?
>that's bullshit.
because what they write actually has some merit. they actually put some effort
into it.
what you and the congress of subhuman clowns submit is shit.. and you want us to
throw you a parade just because you posted something on a usenet group. sorry,
dumbass, the world does not work that way.
>i notice, especially, that you go out of your way
>to point to "good" poems by them. however, they
>rarely, if ever, have anything good to say about
>yours.
YEAH!!! it's a conspiracy to crush your literary genius, huh?
>the same goes with goerge.
>he's very diplomatic with those people.
>however, they act like they're the .in
>second coming all rolled up into one.
i mustume you don't have a clue what the word "diplomatic" means.
>they can say i whine all they want.
>i've got my opinions.
that's what you call those... most interesting.
>they think i'm influenced by you.
>that's bullshit. i don't kiss anybody's
>ass around here. i'm a floater.
>however, i HATE egotisticalholes.
then you must really detest dockery.
>i suppose that's why i gravitate in your
>direction. same with george.
the stupid will gravitate towards their kind, that's for sure.
but did we have to allow them to access the internet?
>if it's about "sides," i'm on the side
>of people who don't show off, or get
>too egotistical. i'm also on the side
>of those who enjoy sharing more than
>comparing creative writing, especially
>on an open forum where trolls and k00ks
>flourish.
i say we shouldn't support stupid people. i say we don't support moronic points
of views, like: anyone can write. that's a pretty .ing dumbass idea.
legally i have to allow you the same rights that i possess. but i don't have to
sit idly by why you spout theories that are just idiotic.
stupid people need to know their place in our society.
want to clear the dishes from my table after each course, fine. want to clean my
house and take out my garbage and bring me take-out, cool.
but accept you as my equal, or accept the idea that your creativity is equal to
those who are actually creative and intelligent?
no .ing way, pal.
now shut up and go get me something to eat.
most sincerely,
GodBuilt
--
-----------------------------------------------
"I am a false prophet and God is a superstition.." "Again!"
There Will Be Blood |
