On Sep 25, 3:48=A0am, Her Illustrious Ashes
wrote:
> Orson Wells as CitizenCain wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Will Dockery" wrote in message
> >news:71c52$48d6e5dd$4b4c71e9$28588@KNOLOGY.NET...
> >> "Orson Wells as CitizenCain" wrote:
> >>> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> >>>>>news:7a98a866-fdb7-4f7b-aaff-f9e167716660@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.co=
m...
>
> >>>>> Little Homeless Clown
>
> >>>>> So I been out rambling
> >>>>> shambling
> >>>>> through the trailer park 'til dawn.
> >>>> That's the closest to an autobiography you'll get, Dockery.
>
> >>>> A part of it, yes.
> >>> God damn bum. Get a haircut, loser.
> >> Your odd obsession with my appearance is noted...
>
> > There's no obsession. I'm telling you that you look like a .in' seri=
al
> > killer and need a haircut.
>
> Damn, why don't you lighten up a little? Your obsession is starting to
> sound like hate crime.
Has anyone else thought of - or tested - the idea that some of these
seemingly automatic mono-postings that seem to respond unerringly to
every post by certain individuals may be created by bots? I.E. NNTP
parsing/posting scripts that require no human intervention to plaster
the drivel/spam into the groups? I find it almost inconceivable that
an actual human would spend most of every day e.g. ferreting out every
post by Will Dockery on Usenet, and replying to them each with non-
sensical one-liners that mean nothing to anyone. I, personally, would
write a script to that before I would waste the time require for 3 or
4 hundred posts of that nature per day. Of course, I strongly
suspect that Will is actually a bot, himself, since he does seem to
hit them back each and everyone, himself. Kinda sad, imo, that Will
continues to believe that these posts come from a person at a keyboard
- he tries so hard to get them to make sense, and doesn't seem to
understand why they don't yield to reason and logic. |
